WNBA Salaries Only a Glimpse of Structural Issues Within the League

Following being drafted No.1 overall by the Indiana Fever last week, Caitlin Clark’s rookie contract sparked outrage by fans on social media. Under the WNBA’s current collective bargaining agreement, Clark will make a base salary of $76,535 this season and $338,056 in salary over the course of four years. This is certainly a huge pay gap when comparing it to the NBA’s 2023 No.1 overall draft pick Victor Wembanyama’s four-year, $55.2 million rookie contract.

But WNBA salaries are more of an equity issue more so than an equality issue. The NBA is a 77-year-old organization that, in 2022, generated about $10 billion in revenue; on the other hand, the WNBA is only 27 years old and – according to a Bloomberg News report – was estimated to make $180 to $200 million in revenue for the 2023 season.

WNBA revenues have nearly doubled over the last four years, but the players’ portion of the profits have decreased. During the 2023 season, players’ share of revenue was estimated at about 9.3 percent, which is about a 2 percent decline from 2019. Meanwhile, NBA players receive a little bit above 50 percent of their league’s profit sharing. So long before last week’s draft, this is the disparity W players have been speaking about – receiving more basketball related income, which will increase players’ salaries and their overall player experience. Here’s how players receiving less than 50 percent BRI has impacted the W:

Limited Roster Space

Teams are allowed 12 players on their rosters, but some can only afford 11 due to the salary cap – which is the budget each team is allowed to spend on player salaries – and having multiple players on maximum contracts. The 2024 season cap is $1,463,200. It’s set to increase by 3 percent every year, maxing out at about $1,598,800 for the 2027 season. The W has a hard cap, meaning teams can’t go over the allotted number during the regular season unless the league grants a player a hardship exception – an emergency contract offered to a player by a team that has less than 11 players available to play due to injuries or illness. Many W players have been in favor of roster expansion, but it would require changes to the current collective bargaining agreement, which expires after the 2027 season. Either the league or the players have the option to terminate the CBA following the 2025 season if they provide written notice on or before Nov. 01, 2024. The players should opt out of the current CBA because there isn’t any room for growth. A 3 percent increase doesn’t even cover the minimum salary of a drafted player. This is why only 15 of the 36 draftees in 2023 appeared on opening day rosters and this will likely be the case for the 2024 season, as players will be waived during training camp.

Franchise Expansion

Maybe this is why WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has been in favor of franchise expansion. On the day of the draft, Engelbert told reporters she’s confident the league will expand to 16 teams by 2028, with a goal to bring in a 14th team by 2026. Engelbert mentioned cities like Philadelphia, Toronto, Portland, Denver, Nashville and South Florida as places the W is in discussions with for potential expansion franchises. Late last year, the W announced it’s adding a 13th team, owned by the Golden State Warriors, that will begin play with the 2025 season. Since Portland was a frontrunner for a second expansion franchise last year, it’ll likely be the 14th team added in 2026; the W hosted a preseason game in Toronto last May between the Chicago Sky and Minnesota Lynx at Scotiabank Arena, which drew a sellout-crowd of 19, 923 fans, so Toronto will probably receive a bid for a franchise; and I like either Nashville or South Florida for the 16th franchise because those are areas experiencing continued growth, more expansion is needed in the Southeastern region and Tennessee and Florida are states that don’t tax earned income, which would be beneficial for players.

The WNBA expanding is a pressing issue, with talented rookies and veterans inevitably being cut each season due to the league’s hard salary cap, but where will the money come from to afford 11-to-12 new salaries for the Golden State franchise? The Warriors organization did agree to pay a $50 million expansion fee over the course of 10 years, so maybe there’s an exception to the cap under the current CBA for adding a new team. Nevertheless, it’s a great opportunity for players who’ve gone undrafted, who were formerly cut and who are trying out from overseas to make a WNBA roster.

Current Collective Bargaining Agreement

Under the active CBA, implemented in the 2020 season, players are receiving an increase in total cash compensation – consisting of base salary, additional performance bonuses, prize pools for newly created in-season competitions and league and team marketing deals.

https://byoungncompany.com/2020/02/10/how-the-wnbas-new-collective-bargaining-agreement-impacts-current-and-future-players/

But the 50-50 revenue sharing has been contingent upon the league achieving revenue growth targets from broadcast agreements, marketing partnerships and licensing deals. 2023 was the W’s most-watched regular season in 21 years and viewership across its national television partners – ABC, CBS, ESPN and ESPN 2 – was up 21 percent over the 2022 season. The league also set new highs across WNBA digital platforms, social media engagement and sports betting. And Commissioner Engelbert has even referenced how viewership, attendance, merchandise sales and sponsorship interests are growing.

If the league is evolving in the aforementioned areas, players should now be receiving or close to receiving 50 percent of basketball related income. But the players’ profit share has shrunken.

In early 2022, the W announced a $75 million capital raise. Investors included Nike; former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; former NBA players Pau Gasol and Baron Davis; WNBA legend Swin Cash and multiple NBA and WNBA owners.

The funds were expected to be used for “brand elevation, marketing… human capital and operational optimization as part of an overall effort to address some of the league’s obstacles to growth and generating new revenue.”

Chartered Flights

Under the current CBA, players fly premium economy class on commercial flights.

https://byoungncompany.com/2019/11/05/the-state-of-the-wnba-part-2/

New York Liberty owners Joe Tsai and Clara Wu Tsai were fined $500,00 for violating the rules of the CBA by paying for charter flights for their team during the second half of the 2021 season and a trip to Napa Valley following a game against the Seattle Storm. These benefits exceeded the allowable compensation to players.

The W recently announced it will continue to pay for charter flights for the playoffs as well as back-to-back games that require air travel during the upcoming season. The league spent $4 million on charters in 2023 and plans to do the same this year.

It’s possible the $75 million raised has been set aside for future expansion franchises. And since the capital can’t be put towards player salaries because of the cap, some of it should be invested to provide charter flights for all regular season and playoff games.

Prioritization Rule

The prioritization clause requires players to prioritize the WNBA over international leagues. Since many WNBA players compete overseas to supplement their incomes, some players arrive late to W training camps, miss them entirely or even miss games at the start of the season. It was negotiated as a part of the active CBA in 2020 but didn’t go into effect until the beginning of the 2023 season. Players with more than two years of experience were required to complete overseas play and report to their WNBA teams before the start of the regular season. They were fined 1 percent of their base salary for every day of training camp they missed and suspended for the year if they failed to report by the start of the season. The rules are more challenging for 2024.

Owners wanted players to put the W first and players gained salary increases as a result of the compromise. The rule impacts some players more than others; for example, it doesn’t affect players like Candace Parker and Chiney Ogwumike, who have full-time commentator contracts with TNT and ESPN, respectively, when they’re not playing for the W. But for players like Breanna Stewart, who earns about $1.5 million per season overseas, the rule cuts into a huge source of her income.

https://byoungncompany.com/2019/10/17/the-state-of-the-wnba-part-1/#more-2143

Future Growth

Commissioner Engelbert recently mentioned that just a few years ago, the W was surviving and now the league is in transition from surviving to thriving. So maybe recent growth in revenue and capital raised has been used to recoup losses from previous years or kept in reserves to put the league in a better position to sustain future growth. The WNBA’s books aren’t open to the public, so no one fully knows the league’s financial state besides the governing bodies of the W. However – as partners with the league and the product fans support and pay to see – the players should be privy to the books, especially when trying to negotiate a new CBA. If the players opt out of the active agreement, which I expect they will, it will be the second time in six years.

Without a doubt, Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese’s jerseys selling out, the Las Vegas Aces, Atlanta Dream and Dallas Wings selling out season tickets and increased ticket prices are pivotal for the league. But it’s also important that this money is shared equally with the players.

The Players’ Union now has more leverage to negotiate a better deal upfront with the next CBA. Instead of 50-50 revenue sharing being contingent upon hitting certain growth targets, there needs to be a higher percentage of profit share that’s guaranteed for players. Also, with the heightened interests of investment – and players like Clark, Reese and many others bringing their sponsors to the W – the league should do another capital fund raise before the new CBA is implemented. This way, that revenue can be considered when setting the salary cap and allowable compensation for charter flights.

One of the complexities of the W is that some teams are owned by the NBA while others are independently owned. Some owners want to invest more and others don’t, which has been to the detriment of the players. The fundraise will allow interested team owners to invest what they want and the money can be used to benefit all WNBA franchises. The W is an organization that’s still on the rise, but there’s more than can be done right now to increase the players’ profit share. And that’s all the women are asking.

https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/38574635/wnba-expansion-golden-state-warriors-everything-know

https://justwomenssports.com/reads/wnba-2023-draft-picks-opening-day-rosters-cuts/#:~:text=Stars%20from%20each%20of%20this,No

https://www.popsugar.com/fitness/wnba-roster-cuts-49354644

http://WNBA Raises Funding to Promote League’s Long-Term Development; Reported Total $75M | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors | Bleacher Report

http://WNBA Charter Flight Scandal Reveals Divide Between Governors | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors | Bleacher Report

https://frontofficesports.com/wnba-players-not-reaping-leagues-revenue-gains/

How We’ve Gotten to More Parity in Women’s College Basketball

As a former college basketball player, it’s been special to watch the evolvement of the women’s game, specifically the past seven years.

With the exception of a loss to Stanford during the 2014-15 season, from March 23, 2013 to March 31, 2017, the UCONN Huskies had their way, winning four straight national championships and pulling off a 111-game win streak en route to two of those titles. The Huskies’ dominance was a display of greatness and, apart from a few challenges here and there from programs like Stanford and Notre Dame, it was UCONN and everybody else.

Then, on March 31, 2017, one of the most memorable moments in sports happened. Morgan William’s buzzer-beater during the Final Four matchup between Mississippi State and UCONN ended the Huskies’ win streak. It was a great day to be a Bulldog. And that shot was the beginning of a shift to more parity in women’s college basketball. No longer were teams afraid of the big bad wolf.

UCONN competed for another title in 2022 but hasn’t won a chip since 2016. The last six NCAA tournaments have concluded with five different national champs. With teams adding new recruits and the power of the transfer portal, tested and true by LSU last season, an unexpected title contender could be cutting down the nets come April. Early upsets are proof of this, with both No.1 LSU and No.2 UCONN falling to No.20 Colorado and unranked NC State, respectively, in the opening week of the 2023-24 season.  

But, for me, the upsets weren’t the most unanticipated results from the first week. It was the offensive showcases of the South Carolina Gamecocks who lost six major players from last season, five of whom were starters. So I expected this time around to be a progressive season – one where it would take the team some time to find its new identity – but even with the addition of five new players, the Gamecocks showed they haven’t missed a beat.

They were clicking on all cylinders, putting up 100 points on No.10 Notre Dame and 114 points on No.14 Maryland. The Fighting Irish and Terrapins are good teams but the Gamecocks utilizing their size advantage in the post, making plays in transition and shooting efficiently from three-point range (an area where they struggled last season) were ways they ran up the score in these matchups. And as dominant as the Gamecocks have looked, they still aren’t a sure pick to regain the throne. Because there are other unnoticed teams, like an Iowa, and unranked teams, like an NC State, who are waiting on their moment to make their marks in history.

Women hoopers are doing numbers on and off the court – on the heels of playing in a national championship that was the most-viewed women’s college basketball game on record and the most-viewed college basketball game ever on ESPN platforms and cashing out on some of the most high-profile NIL deals – and those numbers are going to continue to grow this season and in future seasons, especially with a star-studded freshman class featuring McDonald’s All-Americans like USC’s Judea “JuJu” Watkins, Notre Dame’s Hannah Hidalgo, NC State’s Zoe Brooks and South Carolina’s Milaysia Fulwiley who all had standout performances during opening week.

Although it has been debated whether college athletes getting paid from NIL deals has been a distraction and affected their performance, women hoopers have elevated their games more since the policy changes were implemented, not only setting records for TV ratings but also attracting sellout crowds. Iowa played an exhibition game against DePaul at Kinnick Stadium in front of 55,646 fans, which was the first ever women’s basketball game played in a football stadium and set an NCAA single-game record for most attended in women’s basketball history. The matchup between South Carolina and Notre Dame was played in Paris in front of a sold-out crowd and marked the first time an NCAA regular-season basketball game was held in France.

Players are perfecting their craft, growing in their competitiveness, and playing with a high level of confidence and it’s evident from the excitement surrounding the game. I’m glad I get to witness the evolution from the perspective of a former player and fan, but I’m more grateful I get to use my gift to write about it in my own words.

References

https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/sports/college/usc/2023/11/05/south-carolina-womens-basketball-notre-dame-historic-paris-game-dawn-staley/71377894007/

https://hawkeyesports.com/news/2023/10/15/hawkeyes-defeat-depaul-in-crossover-at-kinnick/

https://apnews.com/article/paris-basketball-staley-notre-dame-gamecocks-ivey-7bcfb1df88e296583ccac4b00b68eeea

https://www.si.com/college/2023/04/12/south-carolina-notre-dame-historic-game-paris-2023-24-season

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/38810368/dawn-staley-south-carolina-gamecocks-women-ncaa-basketball

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2023/08/15/nil-deals-cameron-brink-new-balance-olivia-dunne-leaf-trading-cards.aspx#:~:text=and%20Dejounte%20Murray.,than%20308%2C000%20Instagram%20followers%22%20(S.F.

https://www.essentiallysports.com/ncaa-college-basketball-news-juju-watkins-nil-deals-with-billion-dollar-companies-onboard-know-everything-about-usc-freshmans-earnings/

https://www.si.com/fannation/sneakers/news/new-balance-cameron-brink-make-history-with-nil-deal

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2023/10/17/angel-reese-signs-nil-deal-with-shaq-reebok/71215220007/

https://espnpressroom.com/us/press-releases/2023/04/espn-platforms-set-unparalleled-records-with-ncaa-division-i-womens-basketball/

https://uconnhuskies.com/sports/womens-basketball/schedule

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/15/that-nike-bronny-james-nil-deal-was-a-big-deal-for-women-too.html

https://www.forbes.com/sites/pauleannareid/2023/04/25/how-lsu-basketball-star-flaujae-johnson-racked-up-lucrative-nil-deals/?sh=796594bc5991

How Colleges and Universities Can Invest in Student-Athletes Beyond Athletics

Even though student-athletes are now able to be paid by third-party companies for their name, image and likeness, it’s still vital for the NCAA and its member institutions to educate them on how to manage their money and resources to prepare them for life post-sports.

In a February 2021 episode of the I Am Athlete podcast, former NFL Player Fred Taylor said the NCAA and colleges should make finance courses mandatory for student-athletes.

Later that year, following the NIL policy changes, Invesco, an NCAA corporate partner, launched a digital game called “How Not to Suck at Money.” The game is set in a college town, where students learn how to make important financial decisions by helping characters solve money problems in areas like budgeting, investing and starting a new job. 

Although the game is a creative approach to assist student-athletes in learning money management, it isn’t enough to be considered the official financial education program of the NCAA, when most players don’t have a background in financial literacy.

College athletes collectively made around $917 million from NIL payments in the first year, with the most lucrative deals going to standouts in football and men’s basketball. This means each Division I athlete earned about $3,700. So while some players, like Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders and LSU women’s basketball star Angel Reese have cashed in on million dollar deals, other athletes are yielding more modest earnings. For example, student athletes who receive partial athletic scholarships and would otherwise take out loans to pay for school can use NIL opportunities to mitigate student loan debt.

Furthermore, many players in revenue-generating sports aren’t well-positioned for competitive entry into the workforce because the time commitment of sports limits their opportunity to gain relevant work experience through internships and career readiness workshops. 

One successful example of a school taking a stance to foster the financial wellness and professional development of its athletes is The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, who partnered with Opendorse to launch an app that provides players with lessons on financial literacy, networking and other life skills. The university also added the #NILbraska initiative, where athletes are paired with peer mentors from the UNL law and business schools to help them navigate NIL contracts, manage their finances and become equipped with skills that align with multiple professions.

More systems need to be in place to ensure NIL compensation doesn’t become a trade-off for career preparation.

For this to happen, academic advisors should make sure players are aware of local networking events and job fairs that align with their majors. Additionally, coaches can connect their players with boosters who have businesses in their field of study so they can gain experience through job shadowing and internships during off seasons.

The NCAA could also do more for athletes who have graduated but may not feel equipped to enter the job marketplace by partnering with its corporate sponsors to develop post-graduate externship and fellowship programs.

Athletes being able to monetize their brand is a well-overdue precedent that’s putting them in a position to have a better quality of life. Career readiness was a problem before NIL deals and will continue to be an issue unless the proper measures are put in place. Student-athletes deserve to be paid but money doesn’t negate the need for life skills.

References

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2SxxVMMeDo

https://globalsportmatters.com/research/2021/09/21/schools-struggle-ready-athletes-success-after-college-sports-ncaa-eddie-comeaux/

https://www.insightintodiversity.com/universities-implement-initiatives-to-advance-student-athlete-financial-literacy-navigate-nil-policies/

https://business.wvu.edu/research-outreach/center-for-financial-literacy-and-education/student-athlete-financial-literacy-program

https://www.ncaa.org/news/2021/11/12/general-invesco-and-invesco-qqq-bring-financial-education-to-ncaa-student-athletes.aspx

https://www.si.com/college/2021/07/01/name-image-likeness-programs-schools-ncaa

https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2013/11/27/role-of-boosters.aspx

https://moneysmartathlete.com/athletes-financial-struggles/breaking-the-bank-why-do-many-athletes-face-financial-struggles/

The Significance of New NIL Policy Changes for Student-Athletes

In July, the NCAA cleared student-athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness. While the new NIL policy does not allow the NCAA, member schools or their employees to pay student-athletes, they can hire agents to pursue endorsements and sponsorships to capitalize financially.

Student-athletes can now generate income from endorsement deals and ventures like playing video games with fans, signing autographs and booking speaking engagements.

Since the sports careers of many student athletes end at the collegiate level, it is crucial that they have the opportunity to monetize their brand while they are at the top of their game.

While the changes have largely benefited star athletes who play high-revenue sports like football and men’s basketball, other athletes have positioned themselves for significant financial gain due to their social media influence.

A study from Temple University conducted in February of this year found that women and athletes from less popular sports would have about the same earning power as those playing football and men’s basketball

For example, it’s reported that LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne has the most combined social media followers of any collegiate athlete, with over 5 million, and is estimated to have turned that following into multi-million dollar brand deals.

And other women athletes, who play sports like volleyball, softball and basketball have signed partnership deals as well.

Women, especially, being able to tap into this earning power while in college is significant, because they don’t have the same professional opportunities as men in sports.

NIL policy has also benefited standout athletes who’ve decided to take their talents to underfunded and overlooked schools, like Historically Black Colleges and Universities, proving that they don’t have to go to big-time programs to see big-time money.

Tennessee State basketball player Hercy Miller reportedly signed a four-year brand ambassador deal with a tech company worth $2 million. And football players from schools like Alabama A&M, Johnson C. Smith, Norfolk State and Jackson State have also reaped the benefits of NIL legislation.

Like women, it’s important for black athletes to take advantage of opportunities to increase their incomes while still playing. Having financial stability during and after their athletic careers is substantial because many of them come from underprivileged backgrounds.

Furthermore, for athletes who aren’t star players or who don’t have a huge social media following, there’s still money to be made using the talents and skills they have outside of their sport, like in music, art, writing and cooking.

Nevertheless, now that every athlete has a fair playing field to make money, it’s important that they’re provided with tools and resources to manage their money and to transition into their professional careers post-sports, which will be the focus of my next piece.

Update: Hercy Miller is now at playing at the University of Louisville. According to the Tennessean, the transfer didn’t impact his NIL deal.

References

https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/2021/12/07/master-p-hercy-miller-tennessee-state-basketball/6418713001/

https://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/ncaa-adopts-interim-name-image-and-likeness-policy

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/31737039/ncaa-clears-student-athletes-pursue-name-image-likeness-deals

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/31738893/ncaa-athletes-cashing-name-image-likeness

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2946352-the-biggest-and-most-notable-nil-deals-in-college-football-so-far

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/ncaa-had-cut-student-athletes-better-deal/601036/

https://sthm.temple.edu/faculty/new-study-shows-nil-law-could-level-playing-field-for-all-student-athletes/

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/30945653/social-media-stardom-how-changes-nil-benefit-athlete-influencers-ncaa

https://nypost.com/2021/10/08/inside-the-life-of-olivia-dunne-the-lsu-gymnast-whose-cashing-in-big-on-nil-movement/

https://justwomenssports.com/female-athletes-who-have-cashed-in-on-nil-deals/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/korihale/2021/07/13/hbcu-star-hercy-miller-signs-a-no-limit-2-million-nil-tech-deal/?sh=7e7abe395854

https://gmtm.com/articles/hbcu-athletes-signing-nil-deals

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2946352-the-biggest-and-most-notable-nil-deals-in-college-football-so-far

The Legacy of Henry Harris

Henry Harris Photo
photo credits: al.com

Wendell Hudson was the first African American scholarship athlete in The University of Alabama’s history. Last month, he made history, again, becoming the university’s first student-athlete to have his jersey retired.

But what about the unsung heroes whose stories are untold because they don’t have a storybook ending?  Today, I want to reflect on the life of a forgotten pioneer.

Henry Harris was the first African American scholarship athlete at any SEC school in the Deep South (South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana) . In the book Remember Henry Harris: Lost Icon of A Revolution: A Story of Hope and Self-Sacrifice in America, he’s praised as “the pride of the people and the promise of a new day.”

Harris and his siblings were raised by a single mother in Boligee, Ala., where he attended Greene County Training School. He was the editor of the school newspaper and president and valedictorian of his senior class. He also averaged over 30 points per game in basketball.

He was the center of an Alabama-Auburn recruiting face-off for what would be either school’s first black scholarship student-athlete and basketball player. Auburn won the battle and Henry began his college career in 1968. He was team captain and an All-SEC player by his senior season.

 Off the court, Harris was a mentor for other black athletes that journeyed in his footsteps; but, on the court, he suffered a knee injury during his junior season and played through the pain for the duration of his career. That injury changed the trajectory of his life. Continue reading “The Legacy of Henry Harris”

Former Student-Athletes’ Deaths Shed Light On Underlying Issue Within College Athletics

USA Today-Bear Wilson
photo credits: usatoday.com

De’Runnya “Bear” Wilson’s shooting death in January 2020 has bothered me as much as Chris Smith’s did, another former Mississippi State University wide receiver who was murdered in 2016.

In Wilson, we’re talking about a student-athlete with the following accolades:

three-time state champion in basketball at Wenonah High School in Birmingham (AL); Alabama’s 2013 Mr. Basketball; record holder for second-most touchdown receptions in a career at MSU; and a crucial member of the 2014 No. 1 ranked Bulldogs.

So for De’Runnya – who was a legend to family, friends, and the Wenonah and Starkville communities – to be killed, in the same area where he gained stardom, is disheartening.

He left MSU following his junior season to enter the NFL draft but wasn’t selected, although he did spend time on the Chicago Bears’ practice squad. Unlike their basketball counterparts, football players aren’t allowed to return to school after declaring for the NFL draft, even if they go undrafted. This rule should be changed to mirror that of basketball players; but, even if a player can’t return to school to play football, he should at least be given the chance to finish his degree – it’s not clear if Wilson was granted the opportunity to do so.

An excerpt from an AL.com article honoring De’Runnya’s life highlights an issue that many former athletes are dealing with, especially black male athletes, and that’s struggling to transition to life after sports. It stated that “Wilson, 25, struggled to find steady work since failing to make it in professional football… and he continued to work out while seeking another chance and had hoped to latch on to an XFL team this spring.”

It’s likely he was “latching on” to those professional football dreams because there was nothing else for him to grab ahold to. Continue reading “Former Student-Athletes’ Deaths Shed Light On Underlying Issue Within College Athletics”

How the WNBA’s New Collective Bargaining Agreement Impacts Current and Future Players

wnba-cba Image
complex.com

Last month, the WNBA’s Players Union and the league settled a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that will begin with the 2020 season and run through 2027. The biggest issue with the old agreement was that players earned less than 25 percent Basketball Related Income (BRI)

Under the new agreement, players will receive a 53 percent increase in total cash compensation, consisting of base salary, additional performance bonuses, prize pools for newly created in-season competitions, and league and team marketing deals. This means, the W’s top athletes will be able to earn cash compensation exceeding $500,000, with the maximum salary a player can earn increasing nearly $100,000.

But most importantly, if the  league achieves revenue growth targets, players can earn 50 percent BRI starting with the 2021 season. The State of the WNBA, Part 2 Continue reading “How the WNBA’s New Collective Bargaining Agreement Impacts Current and Future Players”

How the NCAA Can Create an Equitable System for College Athletes to be Compensated

ncaa-logo-black
cbssports.com

The topic of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been an ongoing debate for years, and now it’s finally on the table.

In October, The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Board of Governors, which oversees college sports, voted unanimously to adjust rules that prevented players from earning money from their name, image and likeness.

The board’s decision was in response to the California governor signing the Fair Pay to Play Act. Under the new law, schools wouldn’t pay athletes but college players could hire agents to pursue sponsorship and endorsements, beginning 2023. It was a win-win for lawmakers in California because they knew the NCAA would have to respond, and that other states would follow suit, or risk losing recruits to colleges in California. In response, several other states have introduced similar proposals.

The NCAA had no choice but to make the next move. But before student athletes can start pulling in profits, the board has to consider exactly what adjustments should be made to its current policy, which restricts college athletes from monetizing their talent at all. The current system is set up like indentured servitude, where athletes sign a renewable contract and agree to play in exchange for a tuition-free education and modest stipend. Continue reading “How the NCAA Can Create an Equitable System for College Athletes to be Compensated”

The State of the WNBA, Part 2

State of the WNBA-Part 2 Image
theplayerstribune.com

As the Players’ Association is negotiating to develop a new Collective Bargaining Agreement, the focus should be on increasing the players’ slice of the league’s pie.

In an article in the Players’ Tribune, NBA player Bradley Beal wrote that all WNBA players are asking for is more Basketball Related Income (BRI), which includes broadcast rights, advertising, merchandising, and concessions.

Currently, NBA players receive 50 percent of their league’s BRI, while the women receive less than 25 percent. Fans pay their money to see the players – who are training in the offseason, practicing every day, and putting their bodies on the line, literally. The State of the WNBA, Part 1

So, the first demand of the players’ union should be that the W’s BRI be increased to 40 percent. An increase from less than 25 to 40 percent is a good start to significantly decreasing the number of players who play internationally, or year round, to supplement their income.  Continue reading “The State of the WNBA, Part 2”

The State of the WNBA, Part 1

 

Maya Moore-The Shift Image
theplayerstribune.com

About a week ago, the Washington Mystics won their first ever championship in franchise history. But the celebration didn’t last long because half of the team’s players are heading overseas for international play. Unfortunately, that’s the nature of the Women’s National Basketball Association and one of the reasons why players are asking for better pay.

In February of this year, Maya Moore, the WNBA’s most prolific player, announced she would sit out for the 2019 season to focus on herself, her family and her ministry.

To fans of the game, like myself, this may have seemed like the perfect setup for a Michael Jordan-like comeback.

In her eight-year career, Moore has already won four WNBA championships, two Olympic Gold Medals, two FIBA World Championship Gold Medals, a WNBA Finals and Regular-Season MVP, Rookie of the Year and achieved a host of other records and accolades. She’s always sported the No.23, the same number Jordan wore for most of his career; but, most notably, she was the first women’s basketball player to sign an endorsement deal with Nike’s Jordan Brand in 2011 at the beginning of her rookie season. So, if anyone could take a year off from the game and come back like she never left, it would be Maya… In an ideal world.

But, in reality, the face of the W taking off a year – in her prime – isn’t good news for fans or the league, especially knowing that Maya has shifted her focus to a laborious fight like criminal justice reform.

And it’s not like Maya sitting out was a difficult decision for her to make. She walked away from a league of players who are underpaid and undervalued. Continue reading “The State of the WNBA, Part 1”